Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19859 (RAJ)

SAHID AHAMAD S/O SHRI ABDUL NAIM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/170/2025 · 2025-09-03

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35178-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 170/2025 Sahid Ahamad S/o Shri Abdul Naim, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Gurgwa Sahray, Police Station Tilhar District Shahjahanpur U.P. At Present Dadiya Tehsil And District Sikar Rajasthan (Father Of Missing Girls) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range Jaipur, Office Of Inspector General Of Police Rajasthan. 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking, Unit Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, SP Office, District Sikar Rajasthan. 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar(Raj.) 6. Abdul Son Of Intjar, Aged about 20 years, Resident Of Bagiyasarai, P.S. Sadar District-Shanjahapur, U.P., At Present Resident Of Dadiya Tehsil, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Imran Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Ashok Kumar, SI SHO, with Ms. Sarita Kumari, Mahila Constable, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 03/09/2025 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of his two minor daughters. [2025:RJ-JP:35178-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-170/2025] 2. Today the concerned Police Officers have produced both the corpuses before this Court. The corpuses are two minor girls and they have been identified by the concerned Police Officers. 3. We have interacted with both the corpuses. They have firmly stated before this Court that they want to go and live with their father – petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the statements made by both the corpuses before us, we permit both the corpuses to go and live with their father – petitioner. 5. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Sudeepak/12