SURENDRA BAHADUR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14939/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198579 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14939 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed mainly for the following relief(s):-
"(I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the opposite parties to provide the post retiral dues including pension after providing the ACP alongwith 18% interest treating him regular since 01/06/1988 on the post of Assistant Wasil Baki Nabish as he has been retired from service on 31/07/2023 after attaining the age of superannuation as he has not been paid the post retiral dues as they are not counting the service rendered by the petitioner as seasonal basis."
3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order.
4. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rama Kant Dixit, Onkar Nath Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Surendra Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench