Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19857 (GAU)

UDAY SARMA AND 3 ORS v. NARAYAN KONWAR AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/598/2023 · 2025-05-18

Nelson Sailo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010218482023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/598/2023 UDAY SARMA AND 3 ORS S/O- LATE NARADEV SARMA, VILL- SRIPURDEOR, P.O.- ADALBARI, VIA- MUSHALPUR, DIST.- BAKSA (BTAD), PIN- 781372. 2: GOLAPI DEVI D/O- LATE CHAMPA RAM SARMA VILL- PACHIM KURUA P.O.- KURUA DIST.- DARRANG ASSAM. PIN- 784145. 3: CHAMPA DEVI D/O- LATE GHANA SHYAM UPADHYAYA P.O- BARUA PATHER P.O.- MAIL BAZAR DIST- BISWANATH CHARIALI ASSAM PIN- 784170. 4: DHANTI SARMA S/O- DHARMA KANTA SARMA VILL. AND P.O.- BHAGHARA DIST- MORIGAON Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM. PIN- 782105 VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR AND ANR THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:MAMTA HOJAI DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S DEVI, MRS. R RONGMEI Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE, MR. N J KHATANIAR,MR. U SARMA,MR. D SAIKIA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Ms. S. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioners and also Heard Mr. U. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. U. Sarma, learned counsel submits that the order dated 09.11.2020 passed in WP(C)/87/2020 has been complied with by the respondents. By passing order dated 17.05.2025, in respect of Shri Uday Sarma provincialising his service and by passing the two speaking orders dated 18.03.2025 in respect of Smt. Golapi Devi and Mr. Dhanti Sarma. Further a speaking order has also been passed in respect of Smti. Champa Devi on 24.04.2025. Mr. U. Sarma, learned counsel submits that with the passing of the aforesaid orders, the contempt petition may be closed as the order of this court has been Page No.# 3/3 complied with. In view of above, the contempt petition stands closed. A copy of the orders reflected herein above, I have been retained in the record and marked as “A”, “B” & “C” respectively for identification. JUDGE Comparing Assistant