Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198549 (ALL)

RAMESHWARI DEVI v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND OTHERS

A227/6712/2025 · 2025-11-17

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6712 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to decide the Revision No. 1764 of 2023, Rameshwari Devi Vs. Sunil Kumar and others, pending before it, expeditiously within stipulated time period as this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the circumstances of the case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 i.e. Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow is directed to make all endeavor to decide the Revision No. 1764 of 2023, Rameshwari Devi Vs. Sunil Kumar and others, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Pandey, Arun Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rameshwari Devi .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Member (Judicial) And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 17, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6712 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench