HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 514 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 10, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar, M.K. Dixit Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amar Chaudhary, Anuj Kudesia, Atma Ram Mishra, Samanvya Dhar Dwivedi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Raj Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Dairy Development Deptt.Lko.Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench