Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19854 (AP)

Gudimetla Sundara Rami Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18379/2020 · 2025-08-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010278012020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18379 OF 2020 Between: 1. Gudimetla Sundara Rami Reddy, S/o.Sommi Reddy Age 65 year, R/o.2 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar No.3153 0522 0767. 2. Gudimetla Naga Mani,, W/o. G.Sundara Rami Reddy Age 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar No.6468 7035 1850. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Gunt 2. The Superintendent of Police, , West Godavari District, Eluru. 3. The Station House Officer, Penumantra Police Station, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District. 4. Gudimetla Damodar Reddy, S/o.Somi Reddy, Aged Major, D.No.9 Venkatarayapuram Town Ship, Ramalayam Street, Opp. A.P. Sub Station. Tanuku, West Godavari District. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 18379 OF 2020 1. Gudimetla Sundara Rami Reddy, S/o.Sommi Reddy Age 65 year, R/o.2 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar 2. Gudimetla Naga Mani,, W/o. G.Sundara Rami Reddy Age 60 year, R/o.2 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, , West Godavari District, Eluru. 3. The Station House Officer, Penumantra Police Station, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District. 4. Gudimetla Damodar Reddy, S/o.Somi Reddy, Aged Major, D.No.9 apuram Town Ship, Ramalayam Street, Opp. A.P. Sub Station. Tanuku, West Godavari District. ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Gudimetla Sundara Rami Reddy, S/o.Sommi Reddy Age 65 year, R/o.2- 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar 60 year, R/o.2- 22/1, Mallipudi Village, Penumantra Mandal, West Godavari District, Aadhar ...Petitioners 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department 3. The Station House Officer, Penumantra Police Station, Penumantra 4. Gudimetla Damodar Reddy, S/o.Somi Reddy, Aged Major, D.No.9-155, apuram Town Ship, Ramalayam Street, Opp. A.P. Sub Station. ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in considering the complaint dt 01.09.2020 filed by the Petitioners herein as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of Article.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to act upon the complaint forthwith, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to call the Petitioners to the Police Station without their being any Crime Registered against the Petitioners herein pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioners: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18379 OF 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in considering the complaint dt 01.09.2020 filed by the Petitioners herein as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of Article.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to act upon the complaint forthwith, and pass..” 2. Heard Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the behest of the 4th respondent, the police are calling the petitioner to the police station despite there being no crime registered against him. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that after receiving the report from the respondent No.3, a General Diary entry was made, an enquiry was conducted, and it was found that the dispute is civil in nature. He further submits that certain crimes are registered against the petitioner and the same are under observation. 4 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Considering the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed to follow the due process of law to call the petitioner to the police station relating to the crime registered, if any. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 21.08.2025 KKV 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18379 OF 2020 21.08.2025 KKV