Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198495 (ALL)

ALOK KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8533/2025 · 2025-10-09

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8533 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Abhishek Tiwari, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and perused the record. 3. The present application has been filed with a prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 21.02.2018 as well as the proceedings of Case Crime No. 046 of 2018, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 342 I.P.C., P.S. Bangarmau, District Unnao. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submit that in pursuance of the earlier order dated 29.07.2025 passed in Application u/s 482 No. 6150 of 2025, the matter was sent before the court below for verification of the compromise deed. 5. It is evident from the record that the factum of the compromise has been verified by the court below vide her report dated 17.09.2025. The compromise deed is appended as Annexure 5 to the application, which goes to show that respondent no. 2 does not want to prosecute the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sarvesh Kumar Pandey, Durgesh Kumar Asthana, Pradeep Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Alok Kumar And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. fairly concedes that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court below. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court, in catena of decisions, viz., Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further and the matter has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter any further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. 10. charge sheet dated 21.02.2018 as well as the proceedings of Case Crime No. 046 of 2018, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 342 I.P.C., P.S. Bangarmau, District Unnao are hereby quashed. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned, forthwith. October 9, 2025 VKS A482 No. 8533 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench