Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19849 (KAR)

MR S NAGABHUSHAN v. CAN FIN HOMES LTD

WP/10219/2021 · 2025-01-13

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1196 WP No. 10219 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 10219 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. S.NAGABHUSHAN S/O A.S.NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO. 619C, 36TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: CAN FIN HOMES LTD., NO.586, 2ND FLOOR, 80 FEET ROAD, OPPOSITE BETHINE SCHOOL, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1196 WP No. 10219 of 2021 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 13.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22