APHC010276952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13877/2025 Between: 1. YEDURI LAXMI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 1-224, KOTTA AGRAHARAM (V), NANDIGAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT A ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME-DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE-DEPARTMENT,A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THEDISTRICTCOLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 4. THESUPERINDENTENTOF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT AP 5. THETAHSILDAR AND MANDAL MAGISTRATE, NANDIGAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAM POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP 7. DUMPA KRISHNA RAO, S/O CHINNA BABU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO. 2-238 NEW COLONY, KOTTA AGRAHARAM (V), NANDIGAM MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents no.5 6 trying to dispossessing the petitioner from the petitioner schedule house at D.No. 1-224, Kotta Agraharam (V), Nandigam Mandal Srikakulam District AP without considering the petitioner representation dated 19.5.2025 is highly illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14, 21 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India and also violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct Respondents to dispose off the petitioner representation dated 19.5.2025 to restore the petitioner house schedule property from the hands of the respondents.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the competent civil Court where civil suit is pending between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13877 of 2025 Dt.15.09.2025 Asr