SANNEY @ MOHD SAFI @ SUNIL v. STATE OF U.P THRU. SEYC. HOME LKO.
BAIL/4973/2022 · 2025-10-06
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198464 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198464 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4973 of 2022 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Ms. Neha Chaurasia, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.66 of 2019 under Sections 394/120-B of I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Sarojini Nagar, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 05.02.2019 stating that three bike-borne miscreants had robbed the informant and his son and by firing a gunshot in the air to threaten them, they took away a bag carrying articles of gold and silver. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. 5. The applicant's involvement in another case has been disclosed in para 3 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of the bail application. 6. Four co-accused persons have been granted bail in the present case and copies of their bail orders have been annexed with the supplementary affidavit. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application but he could not dispute the fact that the case setup against the applicant is similar to the case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dinesh Kr. Sharma, Arvind Kumar Mishra, Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanney @ Mohd Safi @ Sunil .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Seyc. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
setup against the co-accused persons. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Sanney @ Mohd Safi @ Sunil be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court.
October 6, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 4973 of 2022 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench