Dr. A.Mooventhan v. Mr. S.Senthil Murugan and another
CONT P/3263/2025 · 2025-11-20
T Vinod Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198461 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198461 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :20.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025 Br.A.Mooventhan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.S.Senthil Murugan The Chief Educational Officer The Office of the Chief Educational Officer Thiruvannamalai – 606601. 2.C.Swamy Muthazhagan The District Educational Officer Polur, Thiruvannamalai – 606601 Presently at The District Educational Officer (Secondary) The Office of the District Educational Officer Cheyyar-604407.
... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order dated 18.04.2022 made in W.P.No.11585 of 2020. For Petitioner : Mr. Fr.K.Ignaci Muthu For Respondents : Ms.A.Bakkiyalakshmi Government Advocate _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025
ORDER This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.11585 of 2020 dated
18.04.2022.
2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, has placed before this Court a copy of the proceedings dated 19.11.2025, whereby, it is stated that the order of this Court has been complied with in its letter and spirit.
3. By stating as above, the learned Government Advocate has also filed into this Court a copy of the proceedings dated 19.11.2025.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on going through the aforesaid proceedings submits that the respondents have complied with the
order of this Court subject to the result of the writ appeal.
5. Considering the said submissions, and having regard to the fact that the first respondent had passed order dated 19.11.2025, this Court is of the _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025 view that the respondents have complied with the order of this Court, though with a delay.
6. For the aforesaid reason, there is no necessity to proceed with the contempt petition and no further adjudication is necessary and therefore, the Contempt Petition is closed. 20.11.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No msv To 1.Thiru.V.Rajaraman, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Information and Public Relation Department, State of Tamil Nadu,Fort St.George,Chennai 600 009. 2.Dr.R.Vaidyanathan, I.A.S., Director, Information and Public Relation Department, Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025 T.VINOD KUMAR,J. msv Cont.P.No.3263 of 2025 20.11.2025 _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis