Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19846 (HP)

STATE OF HP v. Ajay Kumar

CRMPM/1710/2025 · 2025-09-16

Sushil Kukreja, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

State of H.P. Vs. Ajay Kumar Cr. MP(M) No. 1710/2025 16.09.2025 Present: Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate General, for the applicant-State. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Bansal, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr. MP(M) No. 1710/2025 Heard. Taking into consideration the averments made by learned counsel for the parties and material on record, we are of the considered opinion that delay of 43 days’ in filing application seeking leave to appeal alongwith the appeal deserves to be condoned. Ordered accordingly. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. MP(M) No. /2025 Application be registered. Heard. Leave to appeal is granted. Application is disposed of. Cr. A. No. /2025(Cr. A.ST No. 614/2025) Appeal be registered. Power of Attorney on behalf of the respondent, as prayed, be filed within two weeks. Respondent is directed to furnish bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Trial Court, on or before 15.10.2025, undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when directed and to receive any sentence which may be imposed on conclusion of the appeal. ...2... Bail bonds so furnished shall be transmitted by the learned Trial Court to the Registry of this Court for placing the same on record. List for further orders on 17.11.2025. Records be requisitioned. ( Vivek Singh Thakur ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 16th September, 2025 (raman)