Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19843 (CHH)

MAHAVEER SAGAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2250/2022 · 2025-04-01

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15327 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2250 of 2022 1 - Mahaveer Sagar S/o - Pukhraj Singh Sagar Aged About 25 Years Occupation- Computer Operator, Paddy Procurement Center Vicharpur, Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Singarpur (Reg.No. 1065), R/o - Village- Pandotara, Police Station- Fasterpur, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Mo. No. 7999971871, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya Raipur, Police Station - Rakhi,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Mungeli,, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited, 6th Floor, Tower-C, Commercial Complex Cbd, Sector 21, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur,, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mungeli, Tahsil And District- Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Mungeli, Tahsil And District- Mungeli, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Nehru Chowk Bilaspur, Police Station- Civil Line, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Rajkumar Artani Proprietor M/s Raj Milling Industries, Badabazar Mungeli,, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.04.21 11:27:05 +0530 2 (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Saurav Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Shri Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respective Respondents : Shri Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer, Shri Vivek Shrivastava, Advocate, Ms. Seema Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 01/04/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case exigency arises. 2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh