SHAILENDRA NATH MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR SULTANPUR DISTT. SULTANPUR AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10167/2025 · 2025-10-17
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198420 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10167 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri R. K. Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No. 1 & 2; and Sri Vinay Shankar, learned counsel for the Canara Bank/ respondent No. 3.
2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned recovery certificate dated 16.06.2025 issued by the respondent No. 3 i.e. Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Branch Mudwa, District Sultanpur as well as order dated 18.06.2025 passed the Collector/ District Magistrate, Sultanpur directing the Tehsildar, Tehsil Sadar, District Sultanpur for recovery of the amount mentioned in the recovery certificate against Phoolpati Mishra, widow of Late Tulsiram. The petitioner has annexed the said recovery certificate dated 16.06.2025 and Order dated 18.06.2025 as contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition.
3. Sri Vinay Shankar, learned counsel appearing for the Canara Bank/ respondent No. 3, on the basis of instructions received from the Bank, has submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled on 14.10.2025 under the One Time Settlement Scheme and as such the present writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not confronted the submission Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra, Arun Chand Pandey, Ram Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vinay Shankar Shailendra Nath Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. through Collector, Sultanpur, District Sultanpur And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
made by the learned counsel for the respondent-Bank.
5. Accordingly, in view of what has been narrated here-in-above, the present writ petition is consigned to record as having become infructuous. October 17, 2025 (Manoj K.) WRIC No. 10167 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench