Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19840 (KAR)

SRI.NOUFAL M.K v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6778/2025 · 2025-03-07

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9832 WP No. 6778 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 6778 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NOUFAL M.K. S/O AVARAN M K AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT PALLIPPURATH HOUSE AYIKKARAPPADI PO KAITHAKUNDA, CHERUKAVU MALAPPURAM KERALA-673 637. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MALLESHWARAM PS REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SIRAJ P P S/O POKER KUTTY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT PUTHIYA PURAYIL HOUSE KOODATHAI BAZAR POST THAMASSERY, KOZHIKODE KERALA-673 637. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LAKSHMAN B., HCGP FOR R-1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9832 WP No. 6778 of 2025 SANHITA PRAYING TO DECLARE THE ARREST OF THE PETITIONER DATED 03.03.2025 IN CRIME NO.17/2025 REGISTERED BY MALLESHWARAM P.S. FOR OFFENCES P/U/S SECTION 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) OF BNS i.e. ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT POLICE TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The petitioner, who is facing an investigation for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(40, 61(2), 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, 2023, is before this Court seeking relief. 2. The offences are cognizable and non-bailable and punishable for imprisonment upto seven years. 3. The primary contention of the petitioner is that without disclosing the grounds of arrest, the petitioner has been arrested and the same stands vitiated. In support, the learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Vihaan Kumar -vs- State of Haryana & anr. - in 2025 INSC 162. 4. The learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 has placed on record the memo of arrest, which indicates that, except stating that petitioner - accused No.1 has committed the aforesaid offence, no grounds are recorded to arrest - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9832 WP No. 6778 of 2025 the petitioner. Therefore, the same does not satisfy Article 22(1) of the Constitution of India and Section 47 of BNS, 2023. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vihan Kumar (supra) following the earlier decision has held that the requirement of informing the person arrested of the grounds of arrest is not a formality but a mandatory constitutional requirement. Article 22 is included in Part III of the Constitution under the heading of fundamental rights. Thus, it is the fundamental right of every person arrested and detained in custody to be informed of the grounds of arrest as soon as possible. if the grounds of arrest are not informed as soon as may be after the arrest, if would amount to a violation of the fundamental right of the arrestee guaranteed under Article 22(1). It will also amount to depriving the arrestee of his liberty. The reason is that, as provided in Article 21, no person can be deprived of his liberty except in accordance with the procedure established by law. 6. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The respondent No.1 to release the petitioner forthwith in Crime No.17/2025 registered by the Malleshwaram P.S subject to following conditions: a) The petitioner/accused No.1 shall furnish indemnity bond for a sum of Rs.1 lakh with one surety for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court. b) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required. c) He shall not threaten or allure the prosecution witnesses in whatsoever manner. d) He shall not get involved in similar offences. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9832 WP No. 6778 of 2025 e) He shall not leave the territorial limits of the police station without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. Hand delivery ordered. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 150