Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198398 (ALL)

KRISHNA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4

BAIL/6129/2025 · 2025-11-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6129 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant despite notice. 2. he applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 0131/2025, under U/S 137(2), 87, 351(4), 64(1) B.N.S. and 3/4 of the POCSO Act, Police Station - Ahirauli, District - Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant, aged about 17 years, was enticed away by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the victim did not corroborate the version of FIR and stated that both of them are married. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the said statement not supporting the prosecution coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 03.05.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Krishna be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Pandey, Balram Yadav, Vineet Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Krishna .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 10, 2025 Mohit Singh/- BAIL No. 6129 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench