Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198397 (ALL)

MAYARAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/808/2025 · 2025-11-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 808 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. Present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.235 of 2023, under Section 376, 406, 452, 506 IPC, Police Station Aliganj, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide order dated 29.01.2024 during the course of investigation and on 01.08.2025 he has been granted the interim anticipatory bail after filing of the charge sheet. 4. Learned AGA opposes the bail application. 5. Considering the material on record and there being nothing to suggest that the applicant has misused the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, a case for anticipatory bail is made out. Hence, interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 01.08.2025 is confirmed till conclusion of trial on the same terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 01.08.2025. Versus . Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava . Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mayaram Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Present application is accordingly allowed. November 17, 2025 nishant ABAIL No. 808 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench