MERAJUN NISHA @ MERAJUL NISHA @ SHAHNAJ AND ANOTHER v. JAINUL ABDEEN @ JAINUDDIN
A227/5972/2025 · 2025-10-07
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198390 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198390 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5972 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following main relief (s) :-
"a) To issue an order or direction directing to the Principal Judge, Family Court, District- Sultanpur to decide the application under section 128 Cr.P.C., Crl.Misc.Case No. 1833 of 2019 (Merajul Nisha Versus Jainul Abdeen @ Jainuddin), dated- 18.12.2019, which is pending before the Additional Principal Judge III, Family Court, District- Sultanpur since 18.12.2019, within a stipulated period as possible in the interest of justice." Learned A.G.A., at the very outset, raised a preliminary objection stating that for the relief sought the petitioner has a remedy under Section 529 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. On being confronted, after taking note of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the papers, if any, to the learned counsel for the petitioners as per rules. October 7, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Saurabh Lavania,J.) Merajun Nisha @ Merajul Nisha @ Shahnaj And Another .....Petitioner(s) Jainul Abdeen @ Jainuddin .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench