Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19839 (GAU)

SHARIFUDDIN @ SARIFUDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/1132/2025 · 2025-10-16

Michael Zothankhuma, Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010218452025 2025:GAU- AS:13908-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1132/2025 SHARIFUDDIN @ SARIFUDDIN S/O. LT. ABUL KASHEM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MOHUMARA, PS LAHARIGHAT, DISTRICT MORIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR J C BORAH, MR P KATAKI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : SHARIFUDDIN @ SARIFUDDIN VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR J C BORAH Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA O R D E R Page No.# 2/2 Date : 17.10.2025. (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. J.C. Borah, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is a delay of hundred and forty four (144) days in filing the appeal against the conviction under Section 302 IPC. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam submits that he has no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of hundred and forty four (144) days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry to list the appeal and the connected interlocutory application after four (4) weeks. The interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant