Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19838 (CHH)

SANTOSH AAHIRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3310/2023 · 2025-07-23

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3310 of 2023 1 - Santosh Aahire S/o Late Top Singh Aahire Aged About 46 Years Posted As Food Inspector At District Office Food Branch, Manendragarh District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur (Chhattisgarh). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Department Of Food And Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Mantralaya, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). 3 - Collector And District Magistrate Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur (Chhattisgarh). ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F. S. Khare, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/07/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 25.04.2023 (P/1) issued by respondent no. 3. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 3 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat