(1) 911crirevapln193.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 193 OF 2025 RASHEDKHAN MUJIB AHMAD KHAN ….Applicant VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA …..Respondent Mr. H. M. Shaikh, Advocate for the applicant Mr. R. K. Ingole, APP for the respondents/State CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 01st OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. After hearing the learned advocate for the applicant for some time, when this court expressed disinclination to interfere in the impugned order, at that time, the learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, submitted that the applicant does not wants to proceed with the revision application, as such seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh application under section 319 of the Cr. P. C. before the learned trial court, as after passing the order, the evidence of PW-5- Dhondiba, a Panch witness of the CCTV footage, was recorded. However, said evidence was not available at the time of passing of the impugned order. 2. His statement is accepted. 1 of 2 2025:BHC-AUG:27569 (2) 911crirevapln193.25.odt 3. Having considered his submissions and the fact that after the passing of the order, the prosecution examined PW-5 panch, a witness to the CCTV footage who supported it, and the panchanama was exhibited as Exh. 124 and 153. 4. As a result, the criminal revision application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ] VishalK/911crirevapln193.25.odtok 2 of 2