ARVIND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.AND 10 OTHERS
A227/6205/2025 · 2025-10-17
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6205 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Ms. Mansi Gupta, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to some defects in the petition, she does not want to press the present petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 17, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooq Ayoob, Mansi Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Arvind Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko.And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench