HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7483 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sri Satya Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Utraula, District - Balrampur, to decide Restoration Application dated 09.09.2025, for recalling of ex-parte order dated 27.08.2025, passed in Computerized Case No. T 202508100307384 - Mohd. Saleem and Others Vs. Mohd. Yakub, U/S 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Utraula, District - Balrampur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Utraula, District - Balrampur, is directed to decide Restoration Application dated 09.09.2025, for recalling of ex-parte order dated 27.08.2025, passed in Computerized Case No. T 202508100307384 - Mohd. Saleem and Others Vs. Mohd. Yakub, U/S 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously, say within a period of five months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Prakash Mishra, Shamsher Yadav Jagrana Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Mohd. Jumai .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar Utraula Distt. Balrampur And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench