RAKESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
NA528/1764/2025 · 2025-11-14
Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198344 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1764 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that the applicant may be allowed to file personal bond and two sureties in one cases in which he has already been enlarged on bail which shall be sufficient for other ten cases in which the applicant has already been enlarged on bail. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all eleven cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- i. Case Crime No. 141 of 2025, under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Auras, District Unnao. The Applicant has already been enlarged on bail by the Learned Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated 20.09.2025. ii. Case Crime No. 246 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated
20.09.2025. iii. Case Crime No. 247 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) BNS, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheeraj Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rakesh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
07.10.2025. iv. Case Crime No. 248 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) BNS, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated
07.10.2025. v. Case Crime No. 270 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated 31.10.2025. vi. Case Crime No. 272 of 2025 under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Unnao vide order dated 26.09.2025. vii.
Case Crime No. 273 of 2025 under Sections 305(a), 331(4) 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Auras, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, Unnao vide order dated 26.09.2025. viii. Case Crime No. 273 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) BNS, Police Station Makhi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated
14.10.2025. ix. Case Crime No. 274 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) BNS, Police Station Makhi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated
15.10.2025. x. Case Crime No. 275 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) BNS, Police Station Makhi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated
15.10.2025. xi. Case Crime No. 295 of 2025 under Sections 331(4), 303 (2), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao. The Applicant has been granted bail by the Learned District and Sessions Judge, Unnao vide order dated 14.10.2025. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to NA528 No. 1764 of 2025 2
produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5.
Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 14, 2025 Manoj NA528 No. 1764 of 2025 3 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench