Mohanthi Pydiraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14021/2025 · 2025-05-28
Y Lakshmana Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19834 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19834 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :.I AMARAVA" (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NiNETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 14021 OF 2025 Between: Mohanthi pydiraju, s/o Late Satyam, Aged about 45 years, Occ.I Business R/o. Matchivani cheruvu Garru, Thotapalem, Vjzianagaram, Vizjanagaram District. .uPETI"ONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Djstric±. 2. The Superintendent of police, vizI-nagaram District, Vizjangaram. 3 Jlz:angc:rrc:em ::s:r:cetctor of pollce, I Town Cllrole, VIZlanagaram, 4 Jlz:ansatga:IrOanm HD:sutrSl:i Offlcer' I Town Pollce Slat,on, VIZlanagaram,
5. Pariharam venkateswara charyulu, s/o Reddacharyulu, Aged about 58 years, Occ: Business, R/a H.No.502, Near Presidential School, Si±ammadhara, visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Ar{icie 226 of the Const±-tution of India pl-aying that in the cl'rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4, particu'ar]y the action of ttle 4th respondent in interfering with civil dispute Pertaifling to H.No. 1-0, situated in sy. No.69/7 in an extent of Ac.0.45
rs cents, MutchIVanl Cheruvu Garru, Thotapalem vlllage, Vizlanagaram, vizlanagaram DlstrICt While the matter IS Pending I'n O.S. No 32 of 2018 on the flle of the princIP'e Junl'or civ" Judge, vI'Zianagaram, W P. No.4532 of 2024 and w R No 16669 of 2024 on the file of the Hon'ble HI-gh Court of Andhra pradesh, IS Illegal, arbltrary and vIOlatlon of artlcles 14,19 (1), 21 and 300-A of constltutlon of lndla and consequently dlrect the respondent Nos 2 to 4, particularly the 4th respondent not to Interfere wlth the Cjv" dISPutes partjtI-Oning to H.No. 1-0, situated ,|n sy. No.69/7 in an extent of AcO45 cents, Mutchlvam cheruvu Garru, Thotapalem vIIIage, vizianagaram, viz+-anagaram Dl-strict. lA NO..
1 OF 2025 petltion under sectlon 151 CPC praylng that Ion the clrCumstances stated ln the affldav]t f,led ln support of the petl{IOn, the HIgh Court may be pleased to dlrect the respondents dlrect the respondent Nos2 to 4, part,cularly the 4th respondent not to Interfere wlth the clvll dlsputes partltjoning to H.No.1-0, Sy.No.69/7 ln an extent of Ac 0 45 cents situated l|n Mutchvanl cheruvu Garru, Thotapalem vlllage, vIZlanagaram, vIZlanagaram pendlng dlsposal of the wrlt petltIOn ln the Interest of JuStICe counsel for the petjt]-oner.-SRI BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO counsel for the Respondent Mos. 1 to 4.- GP FOR HOME counsel for the Respondent No.5.- ---- The court made the following.I ORDER
db ®- APHCO10278432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (special original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY N]NETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITI NNO..1 4021/2025 Between : Mohanthi pydl-raju, AND The state ofAndhra pradesh and others Counsel for the petl-tioner.I
1. BONU RAMA SHANKAF{ RAO counsel for the Respondent(s).- 1.GP FOFt HOME The court made the foIIowI-ng|' [3521] ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) The grI-eVance of the petitioner in the writ petitl'on l's that the respondent Nos.3 and 4, at the behest of the respondent No.5, are ,'nterferjng in the civ" dI-SPute between the petl-tI'Oner and the respondent No.5. 2. Heard sri Bonu Rama shankar Rao, learned counsel for the petj{joner and fearned Assistant Government pleader for Home, appearI-ng for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. _,s=-`
2 3 The learned Asslstant Government pleader for Home submittedg the wrltten lnStructIOnS Of the Statlon House off,cer, I Town pollce statlon, vlzlanagaram, and stated that the respondent No 5 had submltted a grleVance appllcatlon before the DIStrlCt Collector, vIZlanagaram, on o5052025 Therefore, the pet,tIOner and the respondent No5 were called to the respondent No.4-Police statl'on and conducted further actlon was requlred to be taken on the representatIOn gIVen by respondent No.5 to the DI'StriCt Collector and a case ln Crime No.375 of 2024 of I Town pollce statIOn IS Pending aga,Pst the petltlOner and the case ls under lnvestlgatlon and also a clv" case ls pendlng before the court concerned. It I'S further submltted that the statIOn House officer concluded that the police are not interfering ln the CIV" dISPutes.
4 Bethatas I{may, ,n clvlldISPuteS, {hepolICehavenoroletoplay either for conducting any concl'Ilatlon or medla{IOn at the behes{ of unofficI-a! respondents or any extraneous authorlty. For settlement of the cI-V" dI.SPutes, the partles concerned have to approach elther the Legal servICeS Authorlty or the competent clvll courts for redressal of thelr grlevances. At any rate, at the cost of repetf'tl'on, the respondent Mos.3 and 4 are not supposed to entertaI-n any kl'nd of representation with regard to the cI-V" rI'ghts of the parties in respect Of movable or immovable properties. 5. wI-th the above observations, the wr,-I petltIOn lS dI-SPOSed of, directI'ng the respondent Mos.3 and 4 not to entertain any kind of an enquiry and opined that no
•= TF rePresentatl-ons or Immovable proper{l|es whI'Ch are the
6. closed. To, *t3.L .-#,. . 1. rife Vejag concern,'ng the r,'ghts of the part,-es w,|th regard fo the movable protDer subject matter of the c,v,I courts. As a sequel, Mlscel'aneous petJtlOns, 7f any Bend,ng, she" stand //TRUE copy// ASSISTSAdk-TNRNEAGFsATMRIXi? s Eg=}ot+o+i F I-;lE R I, `i ap;lundcll?%jun:uerCrDe,{satr;y5t Home Department, secretarJat BuIIdlngs, 2 ThesH<PerJntendent of pol,ce, vlzlnagaram DlstrICt, VIzJangaram -g` •' +._.,`6. 3 Jlhz:angcaFrrcali*5JnS:r?cetC{Or of police, I Town clrcle, v,zlanagaram, 4 The statIOn House officer, I Town pollce statJOn, Vfzlanagaram, VIzl-anagaram Djstrjct. I A__ _ _ one cc to sH Bonn Rams shankar Rao Advocate ropucJ Two cos to GP for Home, H,gh court ofAndhra pradesh rouTJ Three cD Copies
i_ .+ HIGH COURIT DATED:29/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.14021 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS