HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5747 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA has pointed out that investigation in the instant case has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 10, 2025 KU Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Smt. Muskan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KALIM UDDIN SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench