Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198310 (ALL)

SANTRAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

A483/905/2025 · 2025-10-17

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 905 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present application has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct learned trial court i.e learned court of Additional District Judge/ F.T.C First Sultanpur to decide the Session Trial No.(S.T.NO.)- 212/2021 titled as State versus Saurabh Yadav, U/S-366,376 I.P.C Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District-Sultanpur in which accused Santosh Singh has been summoned U/S-366,376 D I.P.C and accused Rakesh Singh & Sandeep Singh has been summoned U/S 366 I.P.C arising out of same Crime No.-0014/2020, U/S-366 I.P.C, registered on 09.01.2020 at Police Station- Gosaiganj, District- Sultanpur within stipulated period of time." Considering the facts as stated, particularly the period of pendency of the case, which appears to be pending since 2020, this petition is disposed of with direction to authority concerned/court, to consider and decide the pending case in issue, as indicated in the prayer clause, quoted above, most expeditiously as according to various pronouncements of the Hon'ble Apex Court including the judgment(s) passed in the case of Maneka Gandhi Versus Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248, Hussainara Khatoon Versus Home Secretary, State of Bihar (1980) 1 SCC 81, Kadra Pahadiya and Others Versus State of Bihar (1981) 3 SCC 671, the right to speedy trial/disposal of case is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gyanendra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Santram Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench