1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2080 of 2025 1 - Vinod Mahto S/o Somaru Mahto Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 2 - Shoukat Ansari S/o Rashid Ansari Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur Distt - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 3 - Mod. Alam Khan S/o Vasir Ali Khan Aged About 45 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur Distt - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4 - Mahruddin Ansari S/o Majmuddin Ansari Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur Distt - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - Gulabdar Ansari S/o Gulphan Ansari Aged About 42 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur Distt - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR Date: 2025.04.25 12:30:01 +0530 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Distt - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Department Of Urban Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Distt - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Balrampur Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balrampur Distt - Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Balrampur Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 6 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagapalika Parishad Balrampur, Distt - Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate through video conferencing & Ms. Akancha Vishwakarma, Advocate For State :- Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. & Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Dy. G.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 25.04.2025 1. It has been vehemently objected by the learned State counsel that this petition is not maintainable as for individual right separate 3 revenue cases have been registered for each of the petitioner, however, without considering the nature of the same, joint petitions have been filed which is not maintainable. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file separate petition raising individual grievances of the concerned petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, in accordance with law. 4. However, looking to the fact that the order in respect of demolition has been passed by the concerned Tehsildar, as such, only for three days, the concerned authority i.e. the Tehsildar, Balrampur is directed not to demolish the superstructure of the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha