AJAY KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/11854/2025 · 2025-10-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198306 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198306 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11854 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Mr. Aditya Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned to conclude pending departmental enquiry against petitioner.
3. Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 15.10.2025, a copy of which are taken on record. Written instructions clearly indicates that petitioner has been placed under suspension in pursuance of criminal proceedings pending against him in Case Crime No.1495 of 2001 under Sections 223, 224 I.P.C. It is also stated that in pursuance thereof, petitioner was placed under suspension and a preliminary enquiry was instituted against him wherein a report also has been submitted. It is submitted that in aforesaid criminal proceedings, petitioner has been acquitted by means of judgment and order dated 18.09.2024 and in pursuance thereof, the proceedings of departmental enquiry against petitioner has been dropped. The instructions also indicate that full salary for the suspension period has also been directed to be provided to petitioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is thus evident that on account of petitioner's acquittal in criminal case, departmental proceedings against him have already been dropped. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditya Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ajay Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view thereof, nothing more remains to be adjudicated upon in the petition which is accordingly consigned to record without any adverse effects upon benefits already granted to petitioner. October 17, 2025 kvg/- WRIA No. 11854 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench