lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE Z :PRESENT: T#fHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA pe7~ CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5747 OF 2025 ZZZ . Between : 1. Ankamreddy Ramana, s/o Ankamreddy Appalanaidu Aged about 38 years, R/o D.No. 3-109, Cherlopalem Village, Cherlopalem Post Nathavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District -531117 2. Marri Rajeswari alias-' Ankamreddy Rajeswari, w/o Ankamreddy Ramana, Aged about 38 years, R/o DLgrN6T3-109, Cherlopalem Village, #;-a-I', _V'i::ih_:;_:t'n_ar:I _ I ;i:[';;cT -: Cherlopa]em Post Nathavaram 531117 ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of :::ch:as:art:odne,s:Jn:kmaapraal:a:Ills:r:crtOug hJ#tlon H ouse OffICer, Golugonda ...Respondent petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition; the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to {he' Petitioners/Accused No.1 ancI 2 in Crime No. 41 of 2025 on the file of the Golugonda Police Station, Anakapalli DisJ,FfC-t, in the event Of their arrest. The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the' affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SR{ GOLl: GANESH VENKATA SATYA SA! Advocate for the Petitioners, and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent, the Court made the following APHCO10277862025 ee_se.=t` - _Z3Le&RE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Origjna[ Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIV-E PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5747/2025 Between : Ankamreddy Ramana and Others HIPETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh I..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the petitioner/accused(s): 1 I GOLI GANESH VENKATA SATYA SAI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: _-ai- THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA PETITIO NNO: CRIMINAL ORDER: This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for grant Of Pre-arrest Bail. The petitioners are arrayed aS Accused Nos.1 and 2 in cr.No.41 of 2025 of Golugonda Police Station, Anakapalli, visakhapatnam District, Which Was registered With the allegation of committing the offences under sections 118(1) r/w 3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Subsequently, by Way Of alterat'lon memo the offence under section 118(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) was added. 2. The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 pray for directions tO release on Bail, in the event Of arrest. 3. The name Of the Petitioner/accused mentioned against column No.7 in the FIR format d'lfferS from the name mentioned in the report enclosed to the FIR. However, the learned Public prosecutor has clarified that the correct names of the accused persons as accused No.1-Ankamareddy Ramana and accused No.2-Marri Rajeswari. t:.-ffFF3ZJJ 4. Heard both sI-deS. 5. PointfordetermI-nation.I Whether the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 are entI|{led for grant of pre-ar'rest bal-I in terms of section 482 of BNSS? lf so, on what terms? Point: 6. The petjtl-oners, while denying the aIIega{jons made jn the complaint, submit that the dispute, even as per the contents of the complaint, pertaI-nS tO lease Of a Premises, and the incident is stated to have occurred during the course of discussions between the landlords and the tenants. 7. The case of the prosecution, lan brI-ef, iS that informant one K. Thatababu lodged a complaint with the police stating that a meeting was arranged before the elders between landlords and tenants, and durI-ng the course of the said djscussl'ons, the petitioners acted in a highhanded manner and caused I-njury to the brother of the de-facto complainan{ with a stone causing injury to knee. Hence, the petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 are liable for prosecution and punishment for the offence under which the case has been registereQ' +t,J. `-`p JT. 8. The learned COunSel for the Pet'ltiOnerS Submitted that Accused No.2 had also lodged a complaint, wh'lCh Was reg'lStered as cr'lme No.42 of 2025 on the file Of the Same POliCe Station, for the offences punishable under sections 74, 79, 118(1), and 115(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, wherein the informant in the Present Case and Others have been arrayed as accused. l{ is subm'ltted that, in fact, the petitioners are the victims. The learned COunSel further Submitted that though the original lease period was for five years, the same was unilaterally reduced to two years and when the petitioners sought the return of the investment made by them that led to disputes. It is submitted that despite the differences, the petitioners have already vacated the premises in question. 9. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, formally opposed the ba" application contending that the allegations are well founded and the petitioner does not deserve grant of pre-arrest bail. 10. Upon considering the facts and C'lrCumStanCeS Of the Case, the nature and depth of the allegations, the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail found convincing. ll. ln the result, the crim]'nal petI-lion jS allowed, on the following conditions: i) petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 are directed to appear before the concerned station House officer with[-n two (o2) weeks and on such appearance/surrender or arrest, they are entitled for release on bail, jn respect of cr.No.41 of Golugonda poll-ce stat['on, AnakapaII[', VI'Sakhapa{nam Djstrjct, whI-Ch Was registered with the aIIegatI'On Of COmmI'ttjng offences under sectI'OnS 118(1) I/w 3 (5) of Bharatjya Nyaya sanh[-{a (BNS), on the condI-lion Of the petI'tiOner/Accused Nos.1 and 2 executing ba" bond for Rs.20,000/- each with two sure{jes for a like sum to the satisfaction of the s.H.O., Golugonda police Station. iI-) The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 and their sureties shall furnI®Sh {hejr permanent resI|dentjal address detal®ls and identity particulars to the concerned police and keep the poll'ce informed about the change in address, jf any, time to time. IfI-) For the purpose of expedjtjng the jnvestl-gatjon process, the petitI-Oner/Accused Nor.1 js dI-reCted to appear before the concerned s.H.O., after release on bail on every saturday <= --I a-t--±? between 10.00 a.m. tO 2.00 p.m for a Period Of eight (08) weeks or till filing of the charge-sheet, whichever is earlier. 'lv) The petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall c-operate with the investigation agency, by furnishing necessary and legally permissible information and they shall not interfere with the investigation process like co.ntaCting Or influenC-lng the Witnesses etc. v) The petitioner/Accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not leave India, without permission of the concerned court. sD/-K. KASIRAO ACHAR[, //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN SE lSTRAR loN OFFICER -1-.-.-`5 To'1. The Station House Officer, Golugonda Police Station, AnakaPa"'' D'lstrict. 2. One CC to SRl. GOLI GANESH VENKATA SATYA SAl,Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court Of Andhra PradeSh [OUT] 4. One spare COPY •PSR' HIGH COURT AHHS,J DATED.'27/06/2O25 ANTIC'PATORY BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5747 of 2025 ALLOWED