IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 884 of 2025 Decided on : 24.04.2026 Amaan & others ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & another ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioners : Mr.Yug Singhal, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.1/ State. None for respondent No.2. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Today, learned counsel for the parties submit that parties are not present. Perusal of the record shows that the present petition was filed on 15.09.2025 and was listed for presence of parties on 10.11.2025 and repeatedly thereafter. Today, it was the last opportunity to produce the parties but the parties are not present, therefore, there is no material on record to show that the matter has been reconciled between the parties, hence, the present petition is dismissed, so also the pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 24th April, 2026 (ravinder)