AKHILESH YADAV (IN FIR AKHLESH) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7675/2025 · 2025-11-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7675 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.95 of 2025, under Section 70(2) of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Baba Bazar, District Ayodhya. 4. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was along on 28.05.2025 and when the father of the informant was sleeping, the victim went out of her for attending the call of nature. It was also alleged that in the way, two accused persons named in the FIR met the victim and took her to a particular place and after administering some intoxicant committed wrong on her. In the statement under Section 183, the victim stated that on the date of the incident, she had gone along with two persons, who were in the state of intoxication and the victim was also given liquor and thereafter committed wrong. The medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. The tentative age of the victim is around 17 and a half years. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Indra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akhilesh Yadav (In Fir Akhlesh) .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Considering the improbability of the allegation and the fact that the applicant and the victim had taken liquor together and the medical not corroborating the allegation and the fact the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 31.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Akhilesh Yadav (In Fir Akhlesh) be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 14, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7675 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench