SHAILENDRA KUMAR MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. P.W.D. LKO. U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1078/2025 · 2025-10-15
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198278 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198278 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1078 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Admittedly, as informed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the road on which the encroachment has been alleged, is a public road within Gram Sabha- Dashrathpur, Tehsil- Patti, District- Pratapgarh, therefore, there is a remedy available under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or for that matter under Section 152 BNSS, 2023 corresponding to Section 133 CrPC.
3. The petitioner may, if there is a cause, avail such remedy or he may approach the concerned official of the Public Works Department which maintains the record.
4. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 15, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Upadhyay, Diksha Tiwari, Sanjana Upadhyay, Saurabh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Shailendra Kumar Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko. U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench