JAHANGEER ALAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. U.P. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7967/2024 · 2025-11-17
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7967 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner, as such, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned A.G.A. could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with the liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage.
November 17, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vimal Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Apoorva Jyoti, Neeraj Kumar Rawat (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Jahangeer Alam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench