Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198275 (ALL)

AKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 8 OTHERS

CRLP/9942/2025 · 2025-11-12

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9942 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anirudh Singh, learned AGA for the State- opposite parties no.1 to 3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to opposite party nos. 4 to 9 is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 & 3 for conducting fair investigation in the case Crime No. 346/2025 under section 318 (4), 319 (2), 336 (3), 338, 340 (2), 351 (3), 352 of B.N.S. & 3 (1) (d)/3 (1) (Gha)/3 (2) (V) of S.C./S.T. Act with P.S. Para, Lucknow, as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition". 4. Sri Anirudh Singh, learned A.G.A. has informed that in the present case investigation has been completed and final report has been filed. 5. In wake of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition, however, it is always open for the aggrieved person to challenge the final report before the competent court/authority strictly in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Akash .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. . (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) November 12, 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 9942 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench