- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21080 WP No. 6922 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 6922 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR.N. MARI MUTHU S/O LATE A. NALLASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/A NO.62/A, HENNUR BANDE, KALYANANAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560043. 2. M. SUNDAR S/O MR. MARI MUTHU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/A NO.62/A, HENNUR BANDE, KALYANANAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560043 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SYED KHAMRUDDIN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SSP OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21080 WP No. 6922 of 2023 BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, SECOND FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR K.R.PURAM, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 4. MR. BYANNA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A YARAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAGUBI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560043. 5. MR. JAIRAMA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A YARAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAGUBI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560043. 6. MR MANJUNATHA S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/A YARAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAGUBI POST, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATHA.K, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3, SRI. H.T.JAGANNATHA., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO 6) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21080 WP No. 6922 of 2023 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 06.12.2016 IN R.A. (BE) NO.43/2015- 16 PASSED BY THE R-2 SETTING-ASIDE ENTRIES M.R. NO. 60/2005 DTD 29.08.2005 (ANNX-A) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. Syed Khamruddin, learned counsel appearing for petitioners and Sri. Manjunath K., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 2. In this writ petition, petitioners are assailing the order dated 06.12.2016 passed by respondent No.2 in RA(BE).No.43/2015-16 (Annexure-A). 3. It is submitted by the learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents that, petitioners are having efficacious remedy under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short 'Act of 1964'). - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21080 WP No. 6922 of 2023 4. In that view of the matter, without considering the merits of the case, I am of the view that, the writ petition is not maintainable, as petitioners are having efficacious remedy under Section 136(3) of the Act of 1964. 5. It is open for petitioners to approach the Competent Authority to address their grievances. It is made clear that all contentions of the parties are kept open. 6. The period spent by petitioners herein has to be condoned by the Appellate Authority, if petitioners herein prefer the Revision Petition before the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act of 1964 within a period of two weeks from today. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68