Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19827 (JHR)

Surendra Kachhap v. Central Bank Of India Represented Through Its General Manager And Ors

WPC/6258/2016 · 2025-09-11

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27702 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6258 of 2016 -- Surendra Kachhap Son of Late Phanindra Kachhap Resident of Kalyanpur, House No. 271, Road No. 2, Singhmore, P.O-Hatia, P.S Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834003 .........Petitioner Versus 1. Central Bank of India, Represented through its General Manager, 17th Floor, Central Office, Chandramukhi Nariman Point, P.O-G.P.O. Nariman Point, P.S. Marine Drive, Mumbai -400 021 2. The General Manager, 17th Floor, Central Office. Chandramukhi Nariman Point, P.O. G.P.O. Nariman Point, P.S. Marine Drive, Mumbai- 400 021 3. The Field Zonal Manager, Zonal Office, Morya Lok Complex, Dak Bangla Road, Kotwali Police Station, Patna-803201. 4. The Assistant General Manager, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Krishna Arcade, 2nd Floor, Booty more, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi - 834009. 5. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Ranchi Main Branch, P.O. G.P.O. P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi- 834001. .....Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Rashidi, Advocate For the Resp.-Bank : Mr. P.A.S.Pati, Advocate Mr. Akshya Kumar, Advocate -- 24/11.09.2025 After some argument, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to file a fresh writ application in order to bring on record a certain documents, which are necessary for adjudication of the claim made by the Petitioner in this writ application. 2. There is no objection from the Respondent- Bank. 3. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of with the liberty, as prayed for. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk