1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.222 of 2024 Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Rajesh Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus Himachal Urban Development Authority & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. C.N. Singh and Mr. Anshul Gandhi, Advocates, for respondent No.1. : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 & 3-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner apprises the Court that though in this case, the respondents have filed Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against the judgment, execution of which is being prayed for, however, in light of the aforesaid fact, the respondent-Authority has taken a decision to implement the judgment passed by this Court, subject to the outcome of the SLP preferred before the Hon’ble -2- Supreme Court, these proceedings, therefore, be disposed of by directing the respondents to do the needful expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that needful, subject to the outcome of the SLP, shall be done within six weeks. His statement is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival thereof, by filing an appropriate application, if needful is not done within a period of six weeks from today by the Authority concerned and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) 22nd September, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)