Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198261 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR TIWARI v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (URBAN) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/11966/2025 · 2025-10-10

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11966 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following relief:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to release all the pending dues of the petitioner such as amount of gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance3, arrears of ACP, arrears of pension and arrears of dearness allowances etc. expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to pay reguular pension to the petitioner each an every month as and when the same falls due." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within the period of 15 days; while raising his all claims as mentioned in the prayer clause of the writ petition and if such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within further period of two months thereafter. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. October 10, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anil Kumar Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench