SADDAM HUSSAIN @ LADDAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9722/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198244 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9722 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.299 of 2025, under Section 91, 64(1) (Cha), 351(3) of BNS, Section 5(J)/6, 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Bhinga, District Shrawasti.
3. The FIR in question was lodged by the informant alleging that she is 19 years of age and became close to the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed on various occasions, as result whereof, the victim became pregnant, however, the applicant refused to marry.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued in between the parties over a substantial period of time; there is no allegation of force being extended coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 22.06.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Saddam Hussain @ Laddan be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saddam Hussain @ Laddan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9722 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench