Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198242 (ALL)

UMESH @ CHHOTU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/9444/2025 · 2025-10-07

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9444 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.60 of 2025 under section 105, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2) BNS, P.S. Mishrikh, District Sitapur. 3. It is argued that two of the co-accused Awadhesh Kumar and Raj Kumar have been enlarged on bail vide order dated 18.09.2025 and 06.10.2025. The name of the applicant had surfaced in the statement of the said co-accused Servesh Kumar Gautam who has also been enlarged on bail vide order dated 31.07.2025 passed in Bail No.6993 of 2025. 4. Considering the fact that the co-accused whose name had surfaced in the statement of the co-accused has been enlarged on bail, the applicant who is in custody since 27.08.2025 is also entitled for the bail on the ground of parity. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Umesh @ Chhotu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narendra Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Umesh @ Chhotu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 7, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 9444 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench