IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.9032 of 2025 1.S.Manoharan 2.M.Mohammed Riazudeen ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police, Salem 636 006. 2.The Inspector of Police, Salem Town Post, Salem. 3.The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai 600 028. 4.C.Jayakumar 5.C.Ashok Kumar 6.Hema Raja 7.Rema Ramani 8.Lalitha Subramaniam 9.V.Lakshmi p. 2 10.Vairavan 11.S.P.Muthuraman 12.H.Lachhman 13.Dr.R.Saravanan 14.Sub-Registrar, Joint III, O/o.The Sub Registrar, Collector Office Building, Salem, Salem District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein more particularly the second respondent herein to consider the representations / complaint dated 25.09.2023 and 05.08.2024 with regard to grabbing of the landed property belonging to the first petitioner herein by respondents 4 to 13. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (crl.side) For R3 and R14 : Mr.P.Balathandayutham, Special Government Pleader. O R D E R p. 3 This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents, more particularly the second respondent, to consider the representations/complaints dated 25.09.2023 and 05.08.2024 with regard to the alleged grabbing of the landed property belonging to the first petitioner by respondents 4 to 13. 2. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), on instructions, submitted that no such complaint has been received so far by the second respondent and that no complaint is pending on the file of the said respondent. 4. On perusal of the materials placed before this Court, including the registration documents, it appears that the matter pertains to a complaint alleging land grabbing in respect of the petitioners' property. However, there is no substantiated material to show that any such complaint has been properly lodged or is pending consideration before p. 4 the concerned authority. 5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to issue any direction as sought for by the petitioners. However, it is open to the petitioners to file a fresh complaint, if a fresh cause of action arises, before the jurisdictional Court or appropriate authority, in the manner known to law. 6.. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. 17.03.2025 Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order shk To 1.The Commissioner of Police, p. 5 Salem 636 006. 2.The Inspector of Police, Salem Town Post, Salem. 3.The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai 600 028. 4.Sub-Registrar, Joint III, O/o.The Sub Registrar, Collector Office Building, Salem, Salem District. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. shk p. 6 W.P.No.9032 of 2025 17.03.2025 (1/2)