VINOD MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/12217/2024 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198232 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12217 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.60 of 2024, under Sections 363, 376(3), 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Ramganj, District Amethi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 13 years was enticed by two persons sitting on a motorcycle. Thereafter, she was taken to a separate place and wrong was also committed. The FIR was lodged on 19.06.2024 where the incident is said to have taken place on 16.04.2024. 4. In the light of the said, the Counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the statement under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., wherein, she stated that she had gone on a motorcycle sitting in between two riders and thereafter wrong was committed on her and was left her. The medical on record done on 24.06.2024 did not indicate the presence of any injury. The tentative age of the victim is around 15 years. 5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sajeet Singh, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Saurabh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Considering the delay in lodging the FIR without there being any explanation and the fact the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 20.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed . 7.
Let the applicant Vinod Mishra be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12217 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench