[2025:RJ-JP:23204] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6756/2025 Dharmveer @ Lalaram S/o Gopiram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bhopa Banjara Basti Tatarpur, Police Station Tatarpur, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.83/2025 registered with the Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 121(1), 132 & 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023, Sections 19 & 54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950, Sections 3, 25 & 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 5, 6, 8 & 9 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. Counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in [2025:RJ-JP:23204] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6756/2025] custody since 08.04.2025. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused named Juber Khan S/o Deenu Khan has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 23.04.2025 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3754/2025. Learned counsel further submits that the trial of the case is likely to take its considerable time to conclude, therefore, the present accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioner. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material made available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that co-accused named Juber Khan S/o Deenu Khan has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 23.04.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, [2025:RJ-JP:23204] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6756/2025] on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /145