VICKY KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10805/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198227 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10805 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.288 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 115(2), 351(3), 65(1) of BNS and Section 4(2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Kakori, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 14 years had left home with the co-accused. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim stated that she was closed to the co-accused Ajay and both of them had gone together Delhi. In the statement under Section 183, the victim took the name of the applicant along with the co-accused Ajay. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering two statements of the victim and the age, which is around 16 years and the fact that the victim visited various places along with the applicant; the applicant is not named in the FIR and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 06.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Sharma, Ashish Yadav, Saurabh Sharma, Sunny Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vicky Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Vicky Kashyap be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10805 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench