Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19822 (AP)

BANDARU RADHA RAMANI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/13971/2025 · 2025-06-15

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 13971 OF 2025 AMARAVATI r Between: Bandaru Radha Ramani, W/o Narasimha Rao maker Temporarily R/o. Villa No. 25, Lica Groove Kokapeta, Rangareddy District Permanent address Bank, Tarakaturu Village, Guduru Mandal, Krishna District Age 56 Years, Occ Home 0pp. Jayabheri peak, 2-52, 0pp. Canara ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Endowments) Department Velgapudi, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, Guntur District, its Principal Secretary. 2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Gollapudi 3. Sri Chennakesava Swamy Temple, Tarakaturu Village, Guduru Mandal Krishna District, Rep. by its Executive officer 4. Katragadda Ammaiah Naidu, S/o. Subrahmanyam, Aged 62 years, Occ Retired, Tarakaturu Village - 521156, Guduru Mandal Rep. by Vijayawada Krishna District ...RESPONDENTS of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus more particularly one declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in-releasing pamphlets dated of Dwajastambam (wooden log) on 06.06.2025 in 3rd respondent temple as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative 16.05.2025 for erection of Articles 14, 25 and 26 of Constitution of India and Dwajastambam in the respondent temple. consequently direct the respondents not to erect lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i ' in support of the petition, the High Court may be erect the Dwajastambam in 3rd pleased to direct the respondents not to respondent temple on 06-06-2025. / Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. V. SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI K. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS KOTESWARA RAO, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.4:Ms.M.NIKITHA The Court made the following: ORDER ifJk ss:;^ APHC010277882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisidiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable smt justice kiranmayee WRIT PETITION NO: 13971 of 9091; [3458] MANDAVA Between; Bandaru Radha Ramani ...Petitioner AND The State of AP and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: ...Respondents D V Sasidhar Mallavolu Nikitha GP for Endowments The Court made the following order: Sri D.V.Sasidhar, learned cause in the present writ petition does not necessary in the present writ petition. counsel for the petitioner submits that the survive and no further adjudication is Recording the said submission, infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. the Writ Petition is dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARl assistant Rj^'STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri D. V. Sasidhar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri K. Koteswara Rao, SC for Endowments{OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms.Nikitha, Advocate[OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED: 16/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.13971 of 2025 of AND^ Cj 2 3 S« 2SI25 X- ms o - t V. \ i r.r ■ii -■ > f- r- \ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS i