Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 198216 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR v. SRI NIKHIL SRIVASTAVA BHOOMI SANRAKSHAN ADHIKARI IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. HAMIRPUR

CAPL/2878/2025 · 2025-10-08

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2878 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Learned State Counsel on the basis of instructions received from the respondent has submitted that the representation of the applicant has been decided by order dated 14.08.2025, a copy of which has been provided during the course of argument, which is taken on record and a photo-copy of the same has been provided to the learned counsel for applicant. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Writ Court in Writ A No. 7481 of 2025 has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the applicant to challenge the order dated 14.08.2025 by filing a writ petition. 3. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. 5. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law for which no separate order is required from the contempt court. October 8, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandan Srivastava, Anil Kumar Verma, Lavkush Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Amit Kumar .....Applicant(s) Sri Nikhil Srivastava Bhoomi Sanrakshan Adhikari Irrigation And Water Resources Deptt. Hamirpur .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench