MOHD. NASIR KURAISI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1363/2025 · 2025-12-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 198200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1363 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.185 of 2018 under sections 4/25 Arms Act, P.S. Tanda, district Ambedkar Nagar. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on one incident, two cases have been slapped on the applicant. The first if Case Crime No.184 of 2018 under sections 3/5A/8 of Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. In that case, the applicant has been granted anticipatory bail vide order contained in Annexure No.3. Both the bail orders are annexed as Annexure No.3 jointly. It is submitted that on the basis of the reocvery of one knife and one chopper, case under section 4/25 Arms Act has been registered. Charge sheet has been filed. The applicoffences are triable by Magistrate. The applicant has no criminal history. Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes that the applicant shall cooperate in the trial. 5. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has opposed the prayer made by applicant's counsel. 6.Considering the above aspects of the matter, perusal of the record, the applicant was not arrested during investigation, the undertaking given on Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Nasir Kuraisi and Gulista Yasamin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
behalf of the applicant that he shall cooperate in the trial, judgment of Supreme Court in Musheer Alam versus The State of U.P. and another 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 and without entering into the merit of the case, it would be appropriate to grant protection to the applicant. 7. In view of the above, it is provided that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within 10 days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. On such surrender, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial and he will not influence the witnesses.The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
Any other condition which the trial court may deem fit and proper may also be imposed. 8. In case of default, it would be open for the trial court to proceed in accordance with law. 9. The application is allowed accordingly. December 10, 2025 kkb/ ABAIL No. 1363 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench