HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11810 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "a) issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, or any other suitable writ, commanding the opposite parties to give effect to Proposal No. 4(b), as resolved by the opposite party No.in its meeting held on 31.12.2014, whereby the petitioner was duly selected for promotion to the post of Lecturer (Sanskrit) under the 50% promotion quota, and to accordingly issue his appointment and extend all consequential benefits accruing to him with effect from the said date, i.e., 31.12.2014, in the ends interest of justice. b) Issue, any other writ order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the present facts and circumstances of the case. c) Award the costs of Petition to the Petitioner." 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was entitled for promotion in year 2014 and proposal for his promotion was sent to the District Inspector of Schools in year 2014, but the same could not be undertaken by the District Inspector of Schools and some another person had been given promotion on the said post and now the said Teacher has been retired. He submitted that the now the petitioner is the senior most Lecturer in the Institution in-question and the proposal which was passed by the Committee of Management in the year 2014, still exist. He also submitted that the petitioner may be given liberty to move a fresh representation before Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Asit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Keerat .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) the District Inspector of School while claiming his promotion in pursuant to the resolution of Committee of Management of year 2014 and the District Inspector of Schools may be directed to consider and decide the same within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. 5. Considering the submission of counsel for the parties and without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation before the District Inspector of Schools, within a period of fifteen days alongwith the said resolution of promotion and if such representation is moved, the District Inspector of Schools is directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of two months, considering the resolution of promotion which was passed by the Committee of Management in year 2014, if the same exists up till date. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. October 9, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 11810 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench