HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10130 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Heard Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2.This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "( अ) यह िक यािचनी ्षारा उत््ऺेषण ्ऺकृ ित का िरट आदेश / िनदरॏश िनगर्त कराये जाने हेतु यािचका ्ऺस्तुत की जा रही है िक िदनांक 12.08.2023 को थाना िदवस पर, िदनांक 14.08.2023 को उप िजलािधकारी महोदय, िदनांक 26.08.2023 को ऊजार् अिधकारी, िदनांक 08.12.2023 को िजलािधकारी मोहम्मदी, िदनांक 31.10. 2023 को पुिलस अधी्षक खीरी तथा िदनांक 20.02.2024 को तहसील िदवस मोहम्मदी सिहत अनेक ्ऺत्यावेदन ्ऺस्तुत िकए परन्तु ्ऺािथनी के ्ऺाथर्ना-प्ऴ पर कोई कायर्वाही नही हुयी यािचनी के ्ऺाथर्ना-प्ऴो का सं्ञान लेते हुये िवप्षीगणो के िवरू्ध ्ऺथम सूचना िरपोटर् दजर् कराये जाने का आदेश पािरत करने की कृ पा की जाय जो िक इस यािचका के साथ संलगन संख्या 2 के रूप में संलग्न है। (ब) यह िक ्ऺितवादीगण को आदेिशत िकया जाए िक यािचनी की भूिम (गाटा संख्या 1484, रकबा 0.031 हे०, ्षाम मोहम्मिदनपुर, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar, Anand Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rama .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Kheri And Others .....Respondent(s) तहसील मोहम्मदी, जनपद खीरी) से अवैध कब्ज़ा हटाया जाए तथा ्ऺाथर् को शांितपूणर् कब्ज़ा िदलाया जाए। 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been evicted from her land by private respondent on account of which the petitioner had given application in the local police station for lodging of the F.I.R but till date no action has been taken. 4. Learned A.G.A submits that firstly the petition is not maintainable for the prayers made in the petition because this petition has been filed after a great delay without any explanation for delay and secondly, the complaint lodged by the petitioner has never been received in the police station. Even otherwise the submission is that the petitioner has a remedy under Cr.P.C/B.N.S.S, 2023 as well as the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 5.Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and perusal of the record, it is apparent that the petitioner had moved an application on 31.10.2023 for taking action against the private respondents and lodging of the F.I.R. Since then the matter is not being pursued. Even otherwise the petitioner has a remedy under Cr.P.C./B.N.S.S, 2023 in regard to the prayer no.1 in view of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. and others in Misc. Bench No.24492 of 2020 reported in 2021 ADJ 86. 6. So far as the prayer no.2 is concerned, the proper proceedings can be undertaken under U.P. Revenue Code,2006, thus, this petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. November 10, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 10130 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench